
Essay by Brian Kubarycz for Eyemazing Magazine
His Life Had Stood—A Loaded Gun: Myth and
Metamorphosis
in The Photography of
Bear Kirkpatrick
My Life had stood—a Loaded Gun—
In Corners—till a Day
The Owner passed—identified—
And carried Me away—
And now We roam in Sovereign Woods—
And now We hunt the Doe—
And every time I speak for Him—
The Mountains straight reply—
—Emily Dickinson
Bear Kirkpatrick’s photography delivers us from the world
ruled by science, either modern or ancient. His Earth is not the Galilean ball of rock orbiting a ball
of burning gas. Nor is it even the
still and heavy center of the suite of heavenly spheres of Ptolemaic
cosmology. Far closer is it to the
snowy disc, described by Emily Dickinson, over which “worlds scoop their arcs,
and firmaments row.” Indeed,
Kirkpatrick’s world disk is still more primeval, a flat but living tissue, a
tympanum. Space, for him, is no
neutral vacuum but always a scene of lively action, a setting separated
momentarily from the surrounding darkness through a burst of light. Like clusters of kites swooping and
spinning overhead, his spaces collect and disperse, flock and scatter. The light sources which open
these spaces cast their heat and brilliance as hands cast rocks or bones, in a
moment of passionate commitment, a judgment or a coup de dés.
This madness to hazard contact with the wild is constantly
acted out in the art of Bear Kirkpatrick.
His project is to experience and question what it means not merely to
bide time in the worldly state, but far more actively and intimately, to have
and to hold an only world, unto death, but in the expectation of new living
creatures of awful energies.
Kirkpatrick’s art, from its first conception to the full arrival of its
finished form, explores the ongoing adventure of creation one must take up and
sustain in order to inhabit a world of one’s own, the sole world worth
inhabiting. “I go out into the woods and streams,”
Kirkpatrick says. “Something I do
every summer when it really hot here in Maine is hike out to the tidal creeks
and strip down and swim in the salt water and cover myself with mud. The
more dogs I can bring the better, because dogs know what is going on and they can
help you get there faster. They sort of lose their minds, and so do
I.” This image of the visionary
artist romping through nature, following his pack of dogs, can only conjure
images of the quest, the hunt. And
this is in fact how I understand the photography of Bear Kirkpatrick. Though Kirkpatrick’s could not be
further removed from the modern sport requiring licenses, permits and
passports, or the latest in tracking and aiming technologies. Kirkpatrick’s hunt remains always a
wild one.
Kirkpatrick describes the dreary days he spent in graduate
school. “So many thousands of hours at the desk, so
shut off from the world, so unengaged,” he says of academics. “Photography helped me breach that, got
me outside, in the swamps and marshes.”
Raw contact with nature became a way to regain a lost part of
himself. The path back to wilderness,
which Kirkpatrick equates with the sacred, was opened for him by practicing
photography as a kind of ritual. “Mircea Eliade coined the term
hierophany,” Kirkpatrick says, “for a rent in the fabric of the profane world,
one in which a glimpse of the sacred world came through. By sacred, I
mean the time before time. Primitive
man recognized the power of certain places and often held rituals there, to
transport themselves back to a sacred time in which they could relive the
original creation and so learn how to live.”
Picture lights tied to strings, fire pots swung like
bolas. Picture aboriginal hunting
rites, staged before sunrise. It’s
this sense of rising anticipation, of spinning the world once more into being,
which is everywhere apparent in Kirkpatrick’s work. As is the case with ritual hunt, every minute aspect of
preparation functions as part of the total act of photography. Speaking of a particular shoot, Kirkpatrick says, “I had
been scouting that location for over year. I had to go back again and again, tromping up and down the
salt-marsh flats, looking for the right manner of winter-killed grass before
all the new spartina shoots come up. I had to ship all the photo gear out
there, fly out, spend a week scouting and staking off the area, mapping the
image, then organizing a schedule to get models there. Those trips are intense.” The energies summoned up in these
encounters with the elements—water, land and air—spill over into the shoot
itself. Their effects linger long
after the work is done—potent as the “liquor never brewed” which sends Emily
Dickinson “Reeling, through endless summer days / from inns of molten
blue.” “After photoshoots, when all the gear is
packed up and out and loaded into the van, my brain releases. I will not sleep, alcohol can add
nothing to me.” All the
stuff of life are swept up into one vortex of activity which extends back
through countless generations, which is part of eternal cycling time—circling
and held fast by a centripetal force—a time which existed before our lapse into
history, progress, applied technology, anything leading away from our vital
beginnings.
In ritual, a set of standardized and received scenarios,
provides the basic materials for art.
In Kirkpatrick’s work, this takes the form of basic narratives around
which each picture is organized. “I always approach a shoot with at least
two narratives I want to try and capture,” he says. “Often they do not
work but I don't care because we must have something clear to start with.
You cannot tell a model, Oh, just sort of move around in a cool way. You
must discuss the narratives beforehand, let them chew on it, let them do their
own inventing.” While preparations
of this sort could lead to predictable results, any sense of mechanism is overcome
by Kirkpatrick’s sensitivity and responsiveness to the singularity of all
situations. For it is never the
image, per se, which is beautiful,
indeed magical, but always this
image, this utterly unique instant of
emergence. In this way, each new
image serves as model for all subsequent images, and forces us to adapt our
understanding of image-making in general. “The eternal return,” Kirkpatrick calls
this singular moment. Here,
photography, like storytelling, constantly renews itself, by daring to enter
into new outward territories, and simultaneously daring to sound unheard of
chambers of the human heart. In
Kirkpatrick’s work, this is true of both artist and model. “They must call on something else within them, something
secretive and hidden and enormously powerful.” Consequently, artistic production, like the ritual
hunt, rejects all morbidity and remains a self-renewing form, a celebration of
life. Individual stories may begin
and end, but the act of narration is inexhaustible. The ideal object cannot ever be killed, just as the
subjective interior, infinitely vast, cannot ever be fully mapped. There is a
word reserved for this unlimited creation of scenarios, this constant testing
and surpassing of known limits, this constant process of self-discovery and
renewal. We call it play. And it is play, in the wildest and most
childlike sense, which is at the heart of Bear Kirkpatrick’s photography.
There has been a basic assumption operating throughout this
entire discussion however, that it is the photographer who is always self and
the model or the landscape which always functions as the other. But no story is
ever so simple. Nor is any
photograph. A photograph is a complex totality including not only seen but also
unseen objects, the most important of which is of the photographer’s body. It is the instance around which all
other bodies of the photographic image converge, against which they
conspire. The seen world, the
other, captures light, and casts light back. The more we recognize this fact, the more we are able to see
the self undergo a metamorphosis.
From this perspective, the self, captured by its own techniques of
vision, becomes the other. Kirkpatrick
comprehends this dialectic, and enjoys it. “Here is the fun,” he says. “I am doing the same thing to [the
models and] myself as I shoot these images. I am pushing them, us, to a place where we no longer have
time to think, where all we can do is move.” Such ironic reversals are epitomized in Ovid’s myth of
Acteon. Pledged to Diana, the
goddess of the hunt, Acteon turns from all polite pastimes and embraces the
life of the chase. But his
exertions in service of Diana eventually lead him to the very glade where she
takes her bath. In a dazzling
hierophany, the hunter beholds Diana’s naked form exposed. But the goddess returns the gaze of
Acteon, and punishes him. Having
glimpsed the pure spirit of the hunt, the hunter is altered. Beneath the divine gaze, Acteon become
a stag. His own hounds turn upon
him. There is violence in this
undoing, but also ecstasy, emancipation from the finitude of the self. The Greek term sparagmos refers to the rending of the Dionysian body, but always
with the expectation of its eventual restoration. This burst is but one moment in an endless cycle of
creation, destruction and recreation in which all life participates.
Finally, Kirkpatrick’s photographs bear witness to a kindred
moment of liberation in their ostensible objects. His narratives and images reveal bodies at their most
extreme, exceptional, intense.
They rear up and stand forth in ways which defy our normal expectations,
yet somehow feel remotely known to us. It is Kirkpatrick’s talent, his gift, to secure the
light of bodies spontaneously possessed of “ancient
muscle memory, some bloody quicksilver in their marrow,” as he puts
it. They warp the surrounding air,
gather it about themselves, don or doff it like a primal garment. This spectacle, which lures us back
into the grasp of magic, frightens and fascinates at once. The classic statement
on such uncanny phenomena is Freud’s essay on E.T.A Hoffman’s “The
Sandman.” In that tale, the
protagonist Daniel becomes entranced by a beautiful young woman, Olympia. He will learn to his dismay, however,
that she is no human but in fact a mechanical doll. For Freud this illustrates the mighty allure of the
inorganic, the primeval state of matter—an observation prized by both the
surrealists and their contemporary Walter Benjamin.
The uncanny allure of ancient memories pervades
Kirkpatrick’s photography. But it
is not Hoffman’s Olympia which it evokes so much as that of the painter Édouard Manet. Much has been made of Manet’s
parody of the classical nude—so nude as to be stark naked. As in Titian’s famous Urbino Venus,
which Manet’s Olympia powerfully
misreads, the woman’s hand is placed between her thighs. In Titian, the gesture is provocative,
but not aggressively so. By contrast, Manet substitutes a hand powerfully
tensed. Set against a body
manifestly made of paint, its five fingers appear shockingly animate and
grasping—a haunting “living hand” like that described by Dickinson’s poetic
mentor Keats. Fixed squarely at
the center of the canvas, the hand at once anchors the composition and overcomes
the flat surface of the body behind it.
In an event Kirkpatrick would call “self-birth,
passage, transformation,” the hand figures forth as an autonomous living
form, some pale amphibian crawling from the foam to take up life on land. At once, the sentimental veil is torn
off Botticelli. No Birth of Venus
could be more alarming.
But is not this moment of emergence exactly what arrests us
in Bear Kirkpatrick’s “All Night The Ship Took On Water”? Here, the body, simultaneously
crouching and rearing, unmistakably bears the shape and pallor, and indeed the
inner tension of Olympia’s clutching hand. And it opens a vision similar to that created by Manet’s
painting, an unexpected glimpse of naked life revealed. Here is the body at its newest, most
energetic and most sacred. The
vision of it rouses the viewer’s body with an cold frisson. In an instant, vision is both captured
and liberated, redeemed. It is
this ongoing search for deliverance, deliverance from the present self and
deliverance to an earlier one, which is the essence and goal of Bear
Kirkpatrick’s photographic adventure.
Brian Kubarycz is a writer, artist, and professor of philosophy and English literature at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, UT.